Clubs

Teams

Single

Stay on top of the game!
Real-time notifications in the app

LONDON LEAGUE 1 AUTUMN WINTER 2024/25 (S1)

You need to be logged in to register for the competition. If you have a Competize account, sign in to register for the competition. Otherwise click the button Continue to create a new account. Continue
18 Nov 2024
Senior
5-a-side
Football, 5-a-side

Standings


Stephenson Harwood LLP 1
Stephenson Harwood LLP
LATHAM & WATKINS 2
LATHAM & WATKINS
Fieldfisher LLP 3
Fieldfisher LLP
View all ranking

Matches


Teams


Rankings


Position Name Team Apps. Goals
Assign your athletes the goals scored in the details of each match.
Position Name Team Apps. Conceded Goals
Mark the position 'Goalkeeper' in the profiles of your athletes and assign them goals received in matches.
Position Name Team Apps. Assists
Assign your athletes the assists.
Position Name Team Apps. Valuation
Assign your athletes the goals and assists.
Position Name Team Apps. MOTM
Assign your athlete the MVP award.
Position Team White Blue Yellow Red Fouls Pts
1
Photo
0 0 0 0 0 0
2
Photo
0 0 0 0 0 0
3
Photo
0 0 0 0 0 0
4
Photo
0 0 0 0 0 0
5
Photo
0 0 0 0 0 0
6
Photo
0 0 0 0 0 0
Position Team Apps. Goals
1
Photo
0 0
2
Photo
0 0
3
Photo
0 0
4
Photo
0 0
5
Photo
0 0
6
Photo
0 0
Position Team Apps. Conceded Goals
1
Photo
0 0
2
Photo
0 0
3
Photo
0 0
4
Photo
0 0
5
Photo
0 0
6
Photo
0 0
View all rankings

Information


Rules

Scoring systems

  • Points per won match: 3
  • Points per tied match: 1
  • Points per lost match: 0

Tie-break criterion

In case of a tie between two teams, it will be taken into account (in order):
  • Total goals difference.
  • Team scoring more goals.
  • Team receiving less goals.
In case of a tie to all the above, the classified team is the one with

Sanctions settings

  • 0 yellow cards accumulated: 0 match
  • Double yellow card: 0 match
  • Direct red card: 0 matches

SUMMARY


LONDON LEAGUE 1 AUTUMN WINTER 2024/25 (S1)

Stephenson Harwood LLP 1
Stephenson Harwood LLP
LATHAM & WATKINS 2
LATHAM & WATKINS
Fieldfisher LLP 3
Fieldfisher LLP
4
Goodwin Procter LLP
Goodwin Procter LLP
5
DLA Piper LLP
DLA Piper LLP
6
Sidley Austin
Sidley Austin

Standings


Automatic Qualification

Table

Position Name P W D L GF GA GD Pts
1
Stephenson Harwood LLP
10 7 1 2 56 34 22 22
2
LATHAM & WATKINS
10 6 1 3 104 59 45 19
3
Fieldfisher LLP
10 5 2 3 82 56 26 17
4
Goodwin Procter LLP
10 4 1 5 52 56 -4 13
5
DLA Piper LLP
10 3 1 6 39 89 -50 10
6
Sidley Austin
10 1 2 7 15 54 -39 5

Matches


Week 1

18 Nov 24
Week 1 No Venue assigned
Stephenson Harwood LLP
0 3
DLA Piper LLP
18 Nov 24
Week 1 No Venue assigned
Sidley Austin
0 0
Goodwin Procter LLP
18 Nov 24
Week 1 No Venue assigned
LATHAM & WATKINS
11 11
Fieldfisher LLP

Week 2

25 Nov 24
Week 2 No Venue assigned
Fieldfisher LLP
9 5
Goodwin Procter LLP
25 Nov 24
Week 2 No Venue assigned
DLA Piper LLP
6 5
Sidley Austin
25 Nov 24
Week 2 No Venue assigned
LATHAM & WATKINS
8 14
Stephenson Harwood LLP

Week 3

02 Dec 24
Week 3 No Venue assigned
Goodwin Procter LLP
11 7
DLA Piper LLP
02 Dec 24
Week 3 No Venue assigned
Sidley Austin
3 10
LATHAM & WATKINS
02 Dec 24
Week 3 No Venue assigned
Stephenson Harwood LLP
7 4
Fieldfisher LLP

Week 4

09 Dec 24
Week 4 No Venue assigned
Fieldfisher LLP
21 9
DLA Piper LLP
09 Dec 24
Week 4 No Venue assigned
LATHAM & WATKINS
10 0
Goodwin Procter LLP
09 Dec 24
Week 4 No Venue assigned
Stephenson Harwood LLP
3 0
Sidley Austin

Week 5

16 Dec 24
Week 5 No Venue assigned
Sidley Austin
0 10
Fieldfisher LLP
16 Dec 24
Week 5 No Venue assigned
Goodwin Procter LLP
0 10
Stephenson Harwood LLP
16 Dec 24
Week 5 No Venue assigned
DLA Piper LLP
0 10
LATHAM & WATKINS

Week 6

06 Jan 25
Week 6 No Venue assigned
Fieldfisher LLP
2 17
LATHAM & WATKINS
06 Jan 25
Week 6 No Venue assigned
Goodwin Procter LLP
0 3
Sidley Austin
06 Jan 25
Week 6 No Venue assigned
DLA Piper LLP
0 0
Stephenson Harwood LLP

Week 7

13 Jan 25
Week 7 No Venue assigned
Goodwin Procter LLP
0 10
Fieldfisher LLP
13 Jan 25
Week 7 No Venue assigned
Sidley Austin
0 3
DLA Piper LLP
13 Jan 25
Week 7 No Venue assigned
Stephenson Harwood LLP
3 0
LATHAM & WATKINS

Week 8

20 Jan 25
Week 8 No Venue assigned
Fieldfisher LLP
5 7
Stephenson Harwood LLP
20 Jan 25
Week 8 No Venue assigned
LATHAM & WATKINS
10 0
Sidley Austin
20 Jan 25
Week 8 No Venue assigned
DLA Piper LLP
3 8
Goodwin Procter LLP

Week 9

27 Jan 25
Week 9 No Venue assigned
DLA Piper LLP
0 10
Fieldfisher LLP
27 Jan 25
Week 9 No Venue assigned
Goodwin Procter LLP
18 4
LATHAM & WATKINS
27 Jan 25
Week 9 No Venue assigned
Sidley Austin
4 12
Stephenson Harwood LLP

Week 10

03 Feb 25
Week 10 No Venue assigned
Fieldfisher LLP
0 0
Sidley Austin
03 Feb 25
Week 10 No Venue assigned
Stephenson Harwood LLP
0 10
Goodwin Procter LLP
03 Feb 25
Week 10 No Venue assigned
LATHAM & WATKINS
24 8
DLA Piper LLP

Teams


DLA Piper LLP DLA Piper LLP
Fieldfisher LLP Fieldfisher LLP
Goodwin Procter LLP Goodwin Procter LLP
LATHAM & WATKINS LATHAM & WATKINS
Sidley Austin Sidley Austin
Stephenson Harwood LLP Stephenson Harwood LLP

Rankings


Position Name Team Apps. Goals
Assign your athletes the goals scored in the details of each match.
Position Name Team Apps. Conceded Goals
Mark the position 'Goalkeeper' in the profiles of your athletes and assign them goals received in matches.
Position Name Team Apps. Assists
Assign your athletes the assists.
Position Name Team Apps. Valuation
Assign your athletes the goals and assists.
Position Name Team Apps. MOTM
Assign your athlete the MVP award.
Position Team White Blue Yellow Red Fouls Pts
1
Photo
0 0 0 0 0 0
2
Photo
0 0 0 0 0 0
3
Photo
0 0 0 0 0 0
4
Photo
0 0 0 0 0 0
5
Photo
0 0 0 0 0 0
6
Photo
0 0 0 0 0 0
Position Team Apps. Goals
1
Photo
0 0
2
Photo
0 0
3
Photo
0 0
4
Photo
0 0
5
Photo
0 0
6
Photo
0 0
Position Team Apps. Conceded Goals
1
Photo
0 0
2
Photo
0 0
3
Photo
0 0
4
Photo
0 0
5
Photo
0 0
6
Photo
0 0

Information


Rules

Scoring systems

  • Points per won match: 3
  • Points per tied match: 1
  • Points per lost match: 0

Tie-break criterion

In case of a tie between two teams, it will be taken into account (in order):
  • Total goals difference.
  • Team scoring more goals.
  • Team receiving less goals.
In case of a tie to all the above, the classified team is the one with

Sanctions settings

  • 0 yellow cards accumulated: 0 match
  • Double yellow card: 0 match
  • Direct red card: 0 matches
You need to be logged in to create a match. If you have a Competize account,sign in to create the match. Otherwise click the button Continue to create a new account. Continue

30


For security reasons, your session will be closed in a few seconds.